“Can’t I just paste this into ChatGPT?”
An LLM reads. IACalc computes. Here’s what that difference means for your investment committee.
The difference between a tool that sounds like an analyst and a system that works like one.
Five things an LLM cannot do.
ChatGPT doesn't run Altman Z-Scores
IACalc runs 42+ structured financial calculators — Altman Z-Score, Beneish M-Score, DuPont decomposition, FCF conversion, and forensic metrics — with documented formulas and defined inputs. An LLM guesses ratios from training data.
ChatGPT doesn't calibrate thresholds to your thesis
IACalc adjusts 250+ signal thresholds based on your stated investment intent. A yield buyer and a turnaround buyer see different verdicts from the same data — because different fears apply.
ChatGPT doesn't cite source pages
IACalc traces every extracted value to a source page, table, and cell in the original document. The audit companion shows extraction method, confidence rating, and verification state.
ChatGPT doesn't produce committee-ready output
IACalc produces a structured Investment Analysis Report — DOCX with severity badges, signal tables, source citations, counter-narrative analysis, and prioritised diligence questions. Not conversational text.
ChatGPT doesn't keep your documents secure
All IACalc inference routes through AWS Bedrock. Zero document content leaves the AWS account boundary. No data to external APIs. Fully automated pipeline with no manual review.
See the difference on a real document.
Request a walkthrough and we’ll show you a pre-run report you can compare against your own internal analysis.
Request a Walkthrough